Brooklyn Councilman-elect Brad Lander confirmed he is among the Working Families Party candidates to have received a subpoena from the US attorney's office in its probe of the labor-backed party's efforts in the 2009 elections. Lander told me his campaign received a call Monday (the same day the WFP itself was subpoenaed) informing him that there was a subpoena with his name on it seeking information about the work conducted on his Council bid by the party's for-profit arm, Data and Field Services. For more see link HTTP://WWW.NYDAILYNEWS.COM/BLOGS/DAILYPOLITICS/2009/12/LANDER-HIT-WITH-WFP-RELATED-SU.HTML
D
"We welcome this inquiry," said Dan Cantor, the head of the Working Families Party, in a public statement. He said the probe will prove "[o]ur work has complied with both the spirit and letter of New York City’s Campaign Finance Law as well as all relevant state and federal election laws, tax and not-for-profit corporation laws."
For more, see link
http://www.observer.com/2009/politics/us-attorney-subpoenas-working-families-party-bill-de-blasioLander Hit With WFP-Related Subpoena »
"They said: 'We have a subpoena for you, please call and tell us where to deliver it," said Lander, who got the document in question via fax on Tuesday morning at his Park Slope campaign office.
"Did I have on my Chanukah list a subpoena from the US attorney? It was not on my Chanukah list. It's a stack of documents to give them. I'm happy to provide them all, and I feel confident that when they review them, they'll find we complied fully with both the letter and spirit of the law.
CORD HISTORY:
To: Our Elected Officials, Community Leaders, The MTA:
(MAY, 2007)
We the undersigned Carroll Gardens homeowners and residents, are appalled by the "as of right" ruling which allows owners and developers to erect buildings in our neighborhood with no regard to the impact they will present to our quality of life and the value of our homes........
http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?crlgrdns
Thursday, December 17, 2009
U.S. Attorney Subpoenas Working Families Party, and Bill de Blasio and Now Brad Lander Too
Posted by
CORD
at
1:28 PM
Friday, December 11, 2009
TWO THUMBS UP! FOR REP. NYDIA VELAZQUEZ
OP-ED: Gowanus needs Superfund status to ensure restoration Thank you, Congresswoman Velazquez. For more info please see Pardon Me For Asking Blog
New York Daily News – Brooklyn Insert
December 8, 2009
by Rep. Nydia Velázquez
"The Gowanus Canal has earned its place in the pages of Brooklyn
history. First a creek and later expanding into a canal, it served as
a hub for New York’s Industrial Revolution.
Even today, Gowanus stands at the core of local industry. It is an
integral thread in the fabric of our community, and has been referred
to as "the Jewel of Brooklyn."
Neighborhoods like Park Slope and Carroll Gardens could not have been
built without its waters, which ferried wood, brick and brownstone
from New Jersey and the Upper Hudson. With its location just steps
away from the homes of thousands of New York families, it is
critically important that we protect the canal and restore integrity
to its waters.
Pollution within Gowanus is not a new problem. Brooklynites have been
calling for its cleanup since the 1880’s and, by 1911, Mayor William
Jay Gaynor activated a flushing tunnel.
Today, several suggestions have been made for its remediation.
One proposal by the Mayor’s office, which came to light after the
EPA’s Superfund nomination, would use federal funding through the
Water Resources Development Act (WRDA). But those dollars are already
vastly overextended.
In fact, the Army Corps of Engineers has a WRDA backlog of more than
1,000 projects, totaling $61 billion. Gowanus, if approved for WRDA
funding, would go straight to the back of that 1,000 project line.
The canal wasn’t contaminated overnight, and it won’t be cleaned
overnight, either.
In reversing decades of pollution, there is no such thing as a quick
fix solution. At this point, the best thing we can do is identify a
timely, effective plan moving forward--a plan that ensures a clean
future for South Brooklyn, and requires polluting parties to pay their
share of remediation.
That’s why I worked to secure funding for a study to identify methods
for restoring the canal. And that’s why I am calling upon the EPA to
designate Gowanus as a Superfund site.
The Superfund program was established as a means for cleaning the
country’s most hazardous waste sites. Since its inception, it has
helped restore many of our nation’s most polluted areas. With $1.89
billion in authorized funding for 2009, the Superfund budget dwarfs
that of the Army Corps. And, unlike WRDA, EPA resources don’t depend
on tax payer dollars alone.
Rather, the agency has the authority to recoup costs from polluters.
That means the large corporations that contributed to Gowanus’s
contamination will help pay for its remediation. That seems fair.
Despite its clear benefits, not everyone is in favor of Superfund
status. Real Estate developers argue that the term "Superfund" carries
too much of a stigma. They are worried that the name alone will curb
consumers’ appetite for luxury condos in South Brooklyn.
But is a Superfund site, by any other name, less polluted? The fact of
the matter is, Gowanus Canal is toxic--whether it’s deemed a Superfund
or not. As New Yorkers, we need to be focused on restoring Gowanus and
protecting Brooklyn families, not bickering over semantics.
With the comment period for Superfund status now closed, the EPA has
an opportunity to complete its review. I urge the agency to make the
right decision and designate Gowanus a Superfund site. Doing so will
ensure the canal is cleaned up in a safe, timely, cost effective
manner.
Brooklyn deserves no less."
-----------------------------
Posted by
CORD
at
2:16 PM
The CG Front Gardens crisis brought on by "Bill-der-dash!"; and "DeBLasio caught in the act"
This week, Councilman Bill DeBlasio agreed to withdraw an ill-advised attempt to hide a key land-use change from his Carroll Gardens constituents — but the backtrack came only after a reporter from this newspaper and the excellent neighborhood blog Pardon Me for Asking discovered DeBlasio’s secretive move on behalf of a politically connected private school. Here’s what happened: Thanks to a quirk in city law, the front yards of houses on First through Fourth places in Carroll Gardens are actually mapped as part of the street, which is why houses on those blocks are set back so far from the roadway. One of those “front yards” is actually a parking lot for the Hannah Senesh School, which wants to build a two-story addition on the land. But the school can’t move forward unless the city administrative code is changed. Enter Bill DeBlasio....." But the parking lot in question, along First Place at the corner of Smith Street, is not merely a piece of city-owned land, but an architectural feature that is fundamental to the neighborhood. Indeed, such deep lots along First though Fourth places are what give Carroll Gardens its name. After widespread complaints that DeBlasio’s exception would set a dangerous precedent, the Councilman, who becomes the public advocate on Jan. 1, withdrew his amendment....." "Has Councilman Bill DeBlasio sold out his district in one of his last official acts before becoming public advocate? That’s what many Carroll Gardens residents are charging, days after their Democratic councilman slipped an amendment into a Council bill that would exempt a well-connected private school — and only that private school — from long-established zoning that protects the front yards of Carroll Gardens. The amendment would allow Hannah Senesh School, which is on Smith Street between First and Second places, to move ahead with a plan for the additional classrooms on the side lot on First Place, which is currently used as for parking. It may sound like a simple transfer of land, but that Hannah Senesh side lot is not just a parking lot, but an architectural feature that is fundamental to the neighborhood — indeed, such lots are what give Carroll Gardens its name. And many fear that DeBlasio’s exception — slipped into a bill protecting all the other lots on First through Fourth places — will set a dangerous precedent....."DeBlasio caught in the act
DeBlasio carves out exception for well-connected school
Posted by
CORD
at
12:25 AM
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Carroll Gardens Front Gardens Crisis Meeting Number Two
Posted by
CORD
at
11:19 PM
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Lander's Statement on CG Front Gardens Issue
This was posted on the CGNA listserve this week:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CGNA/
Statement on Hannah Senesh Community Day School expansion proposal
It was good to see, and hear from, many of you at last night's meeting on
last night (see statement below), the proposed change will not be considered
before the end of the year. Instead, the school will have the opportunity
to propose the change for consideration through the ULURP process next
year.
That process will provide a more full opportunity to get complete
information about the proposal, to consider its impact, to hear from members
of the community in multiple public hearings, and for Community Board 6, the
Borough President, and the City Planning Commission to make recommendations,
before a vote is taken by the City Council on whether or not to allow the
change. I look forward to listening to you during that process, before I
make my own decision.
Please continue to communicate with my office about this project. For now,
you can use the information below. We'll get you official contact
information as soon as we have it, most likely early in the new year.
Thanks,
Brad Lander
City Councilmember-
Posted by
CORD
at
1:52 PM
Front Gardens In Trouble in Carroll Gardens
On Monday, December 9, a meeting was held at Hannah Senesh School to discuss their proposed expansion onto the public, front garden lot. Residents of our community, upset by this idea, had been asking our Councilman, Bill DeBlasio, to NOT submit a bill today facilitating that desired end for the school.
According to Tom Gray, DeBlasio's District Director, the bill to change the administrative code removing the restrictions on the Smith and First Place courtyard will NOT be introduced on Wednesday, Dec 9th (today).
Conversations between current Councilman deBlasio and Councilman Elect Lander resulted in a change of plans
The school will be applying to purchase the courtyard and will still seek to change the administrative code sometime in the coming year.
The acquisition of the property requires a ULURP procedure and calls for several public hearings.
It is unclear how the administrative code change, necessary in order to remove the no building on a courtyard restriction, will be packaged as part of the bundle. Nor is it clear if and how bundling it changes the process, but more information will be disseminated as it becomes available.
All of this will now be taking place on Councilman Elect Lander's watch.
Stay tuned...
Posted by
CORD
at
1:29 PM
Sunday, December 6, 2009
CALLING ALL NEIGHBORS! An Open Letter To Councilman Bill De Blasio
Hello from CORD
Dear Bill De Blasio
You are still our representative.
Every courtyard in Carroll Gardens is public land.
and we strongly urge you not to use your power to give our land away.
Do not introduce this bill.
Do not allow this to be the legacy you leave in Carroll Gardens.
Please make yourself available to the community to discuss this issue with your constituents before Wednesday, December 9th, 2009.
Sincerely,
(Your Name here)
A member of the Carroll Gardens Community
Please send to :
Bill De Blasio, NY City Councilman
email: deblasio@council.nyc.ny
telephone:718-854-9791
Christine Quinn, NY City Council Speaker
email link http://council.nyc.gov/
telephone: 212-788-7210
John Liu, NY City Council Member and Chair of the Transportation Committee
email: liu@council.nyc.gov
telephone: 212-788-7022
Betsy Gotbaum, NY City Advocate
email:ombudsman@pubadvocate.ny
telephone: 212- 669-7200
Brad Lander, Council Member Elect
email: brad.lander@gmail.com
Posted by
CORD
at
12:43 PM


Comment to CORD from "I am not a NIMBY!"
"I really wonder how many of these posters on any of the blogs this week calling people at CORD a "NIMBY" live and work and own a home in Carroll Gardens?/Cobble Hill/Boerum Hill/Park Slope? Do you work here? Go to school here? Park/drive/shop here? No one in those categories would ever call this a NIMBY issue...it is much larger that! It is about the rights of homeowners vs. big developers; it's even about recent eminent domain rulings although no one dares to utter that word out loud as look at what happened over at Atlantic Yards.... I am not a nimby. I am a homeowner with a brain and I can read between the lines. I have to pay my taxes after all. Do they? I am not a NIMBY. I am not even anti-development! I am pro-development that fits in with the existing community not overwhelms it and changes it irrevocably! I am definitely anti-"as of right" because the current interpretation of "as of right" is simply tailor-made for voracious developers and not the average guy. A "Nimby" is an easy label used to minimize the real life concerns of real life people. I am, quite simply, one voice here in Carroll Gardens, but I am here to stay. By, Not a nimby, ever.
Councilman Bill deBlasio link
Tom Gray, District Director,
City Council Member Bill de Blasio
Tagray@gmail.com
Tel. (718) 854-9791
Tel. (718) 854-1146 Fax
Assemblywoman Joan L. Millman link
(718) 246-4889
millmaj@assembly.state.ny.us/www.assembly.state.ny.us
Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz link
209 Joralemon Street
CSC Telephone: (718) 802-3777
Fax: (718) 802-3881
askmarty@brooklynbp.nyc.gov
Amanda Burden, Chair, NYC Dept. of Planning
22 Reade St. NY, NY 10007-1216.
You can also e-mail Ms. Burden: http://www.nyc.gov/html/mail/html/maildcp.html
Patricia Lancaster, Commisioner, Department of Buildings (DOB):
www.nyc.gov/html/mail/html/maildob.html