Monday, April 30, 2012

CORD Gowanus Canal CAG Meeting Summary

Hello from Carroll Gardens CORD!
Tuesday night's  general CAG meeting took place at the Brooklyn Historical Society. The meeting was attended by nineteen members of the CAG as well as an assortment of guests.
The night's business included, among other things, a vote on a resolution proposed by the Water Quality/Technical Committee, which came out of a meeting the CAG had with the DEP earlier in the month.
Please read the resolution below:
 
Proposed Resolution:
A resolution passed by the WQ/Technical Committee will be up for a ratification vote by the full CAG at the 4/24 meeting:
 "The Gowanus Superfund Community Advisory Group fully supports the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in its finding that New York City’s Combined Sewer Overflows are a significant contributor of harmful sediment and Superfund regulated PAHs and metals to the canal. The CAG takes the position that the total elimination of CSOs into the Gowanus Canal is the only acceptable solution to the problem. The CAG asks that the EPA, under their Superfund authority, take the necessary measures that will insure protection of the proposed remedy from ongoing CSO sediment solids deposits and the release of PAHs and other toxins."

 Much to the surprise of some of the CAG members (CORD included), the facilitator announced at the beginning of the meeting that the DEP had sent a representative to the meeting in order to make a "presentation".. Initially, we were told they wanted twenty minutes, then down to ten then maybe we could grant them five minutes.
The facilitator suggested several scenarios whereby the DEP could speak before or after the Water Quality/Technical Committee presented the resolution to their fellow CAG members.
It was completely obvious to the Water Quality/Technical Committee members, who had worked on the proposal for several days prior to its presentation, that the DEP was there to persuade the group to accept their version of how the cleanup should proceed.
Why? Because after the Water Quality/Technical Committee's meeting with the DEP earlier this month,it was apparent that the city has no intention of doing anything more than what they already have in the works in regard to the canal...and it simply is not enough....
The science is clear----besides the raw sewage---there are dangerous chemicals and heavy metals that are being emitted into the canal through the cso's---some of these dangerous compounds actually wind up attaching themselves to the "solids"---and wind up accumulating at the bottom. Something must be done to address this once and for all.
We have talked about the city's Green Infrastructure and Long Term Control Plans. These are city wide programs--good programs---expensive programs--but they DO NOT tackle the complicated and massive problem of the Gowanus Canal---they in fact only address a very small percentage of the overall problems we have throughout the entire city in regard to our sewer system--they do not address the toxins and the reasons that the canal was designated a superfund site in the first place.
Keep your ears open and you will hear the city say things now like the EPA is moving too fast----incredible! It was the city who tried to talk the community out of allowing the feds in by whining that the process would be so slow, the city could do it better and faster, etc etc etc---now that the EPA is moving along right on target, and by the way, ahead of anything that the city promised....all of a sudden it's going too fast
Also, watch out and listen for things like the benign.....we want all the agencies to work together and coordinate their efforts.....
This is code for the city to try to get their Long Term Control Plan kicked into gear before the EPA can begin (that  city plan is not set to even begin until 2015--look at the name, "long term"--that means final results are not for twenty or thirty years!---the EPA will be presenting their proposed plan this summer/early fall) ---the city  just seems determined to slow the process down.
The truth is that the federal government is going to spend a half a billion dollars cleaning up the toxic sediment in the canal and prevent additional contamination from the surrounding uplands from entering the canal..
....and the city plans on continuing to dump more toxic and cross toxin contaminated bacterial waste on top of it!
If the CSO's emissions, documented by the EPA in their studies, are not addressed by the city in a more effective manner, we will be literally throwing our money and the epa's efforts into the toilet. How ridiculous and wasteful is that?!
The CAG, made up of local residents, business owners and community groups made a very clear statement...it is important that the science remain the focus- that the CAG supports the remedies that will address what the studies have shown.The EPA studies are clear and posted for all to see with even more information to come. http://www.epa.gov/region2/superfund/npl/gowanus/

It is important that all of us keep in mind that the end goal is a clean and healthy canal and environment----and that we focus on demanding those measures needed to attain that goal----not be swayed by city wide programs designed to meet other city wide obligations the city must meet.
More than an hour later, after a spirited discussion, a vote was taken and it was decided that the DEP would not speak....the resolution was presented and discussed and the the CAG approved the resolution. One tiny step---but an important one.
 It  clearly shows that we want and expect what most of us had in mind from the day we heard that the canal would be superfunded---a clean canal that does not endanger public health---
Eymund Diegel and Angela Murphy, members of the Archaeology Committee, presented a delightful slide show and a great history lesson on the Gowanus and offered up some wonderful suggestions on how we can commemorate the Canal's important place in Brooklyn's past and present.
Next meeting....end of May.
CORD

Friday, April 27, 2012

Reminder!

What is Your vision for Public Place? In this creative artist/activist workshop, with interdisciplinary artist/activist, Triada Samaras, and CORD, we will brainstorm this question and the possible future uses of “Public Place” for our community.
Hee's the link from The Old Stone House:
http://theoldstonehouse.org/calendar/brooklyn-utopias-park-space-place-space-public-voicepublic-dream-mural-workshop/
If you can not make it you can interact at our Facebook page by 'liking' the page and leaving your idea there!
All ideas are important and welcome!

CORD


Sunday, April 22, 2012

"What's your vision for Public Place?" Workshop coming!

The workshop for your vision of Public Place is coming up on April 28th at 5 - 7 PM at the The Old Stone House as part of the Brooklyn Utopias:  Park Space/Play Space exhibition.

Read about it here:  PMFA Link
http://pardonmeforasking.blogspot.com/2012/04/whats-your-vision-for-public-place-in.html

And some exciting developments!
See the Free Public Place Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/freepublicplace
Your ideas and your vision of Public Place is welcome directly on the Facebook page OR
you can send your comments and ideas to cgcord@gmail.com

We will post them for you to the Facebook site.


Lastly use your NeoReader application on your iphone to scan the image above and go directly to our Free Public Place Facebook page!


CORD

Sunday, April 15, 2012

You Are Invited!


Come One, Come ALL!

Come and design your vision for Public Place with your family and neighbors at the Community Mural Making Workshop with Artist, Triada Samaras, and Carroll Gardens CORD/Coalition for Respectful Development.


Public Place is a 6-acre vacant lot along the Gowanus Canal and Smith and Fifth Streets in Carroll Gardens. Your input and ideas may be considered for future development on the site.


This free workshop event is part of the current Brooklyn Utopias: Park Space, Play Space Exhibition at the Old Stone House and newly renovated Washington Park.


Afterwards, you can join in other fun activities such as Circle Rules football and an Interactive Performance Art event.

http://brooklynutopias.wordpress.com/


Community Mural Workshop

April 28, 2012

5 – 7:30 PM

Old Stone House

336 Third Street between 4th and 5th Aves


To reserve your spot/s in advance, please email Triada at triadasamaras@gmail.com

See you there!

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

DEEP CONCERN regarding the DEP's current position re: the Gowanus Canal

Hello from CORD

On Monday night, April 2, 2012, the CAG Water Quality/Technical Committee met with members of the DEP including Angela Licata, Joe Muehller, Kevin Cline and Julie Stein at the Brooklyn Historical Society. The meeting was informal and cordial. Topics scheduled to be discussed were outflow meters and water reclassification of the Canal.
However, the underlying message of the meeting, expressed by many members of the CAG committee was one of the deep concern that many of us have regarding the DEP'S position as a responsible party for polluting the canal (the City of New York has been named a PRP by the EPA).

The DEP has many city wide plans in the works at this moment to improve water quality city wide, as they are required to do under the state clean water act. These plans include a Green Infrastructure Plan which has been widely publicized and presented at multiple meetings throughout our neighborhood and throughout the city. There is also a city wide Long Term Control Plan in the wings---set to be implemented sometime on 2015---all admirable all good baby steps---quite expensive baby steps but baby steps never the less.

The Gowanus Canal along with Newtown Creek, differ from the rest of city. These bodies of water have been declared by the Federal Government, Superfund sites. They have been recognized as highly polluted waterways that present a danger to public health and the environment.

Our little Canal, probably because of its narrow and rather short length (just under two {2} miles) has the distinction of being the most densely packed pathogen filled waterway in the country. Now the DEP and the EPA will point out that pathogens (that's a nice way of saying all of the nasty bacteria,illnesses and diseases that are living in the canal as a result of the amounts of raw sewage that is dumped into it) are not what makes the Gowanus Canal a Superfund site---and that would be exactly right.

What makes our Canal a Superfund site is the fact that at the bottom of the Canal---in the sediment---lie unacceptable levels of toxins that seeped in over many many decades as a result of the gas manufacturing plants that secreted this coal tar as a by product of creating the power that once lit the streets and homes of our neighborhood. Over the years there were also other industries that dumped toxic chemicals and heavy metals into the water as well.

But, what we have learned through the studies done by the EPA during their investigation, is that these toxins are also coming into the Canal through the Combined Sewer Overflows (CSO's). The chemicals, the coal tar the heavy metals are not lying there at the bottom alone---they are constantly being input into the water through the pipes that carry the street run off and the sewage----in fact, the EPA has indicated in their study that these nasty cancer causing chemicals actually attach themselves to the solid waste----that come pouring out of those pipes---the stuff we see all the time floating in and around the canal---sometimes even gushing down the canal after rainfall. See "Holy Crap! Video Shows Raw Sewage Flooding into Canal During Last Week's Storm" at
http://pardonmeforasking.blogspot.com/2010/09/holly-crap-last-weeks-severe-storm.html

Now the EPA came into this neighborhood to do a job. A huge part of their job is to identify the problem. From there, more studies are done and eventually remedies are considered, presented, decided upon and acted upon. Nowhere in this process are anything other than scientific facts and data collected, studied and and acted upon.

So the question becomes---who and why would anyone think it prudent, fiscally responsible or sensible to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to clean up the toxins at the bottom of the canal, cap it so that any unremovable carcinogens are contained and no longer present a health or environmental hazard and then proceed to allow additional toxins to come in and eventually collect and build up again at the bottom of the canal?

This is precisely why the EPA has concluded that the CSO's, under the purview of the City's Department of Environmental Protection (the DEP), MUST BE ADDRESSED.
Back a bit, before the Canal was declared a Superfund site, Cas Holloway, now a Deputy Mayor, came to this community and talked about how the city's plan to clean up the canal would be better and would TAKE LESS TIME than the EPA. For good measure, he also threw in that the city had every intention of disputing the hazard rating score that the Canal received---since it was the hazard rating score, based on the scientific studies done, that secured the Canal's position as a Superfund site--

Scientific fact determined the criteria and science won out--- the Canal was declared a Superfund site and further EPA scientific studies began....
Those additional painstaking studies determined that the CSO's must be addressed and the EPA has a suggestion on how to do it....something that will kill two birds with one stone....a retention basin system that will not only capture the toxins coming into the canal at their source, some of which are attaching themselves to the solid waste----and as a wonderful by-product--eliminate a great deal of the pathogens in the water by doing the same for the solids! Clearly a win-win.....

So what happens next.....
Here we are now, studies in, results published---and incredibly, the city is now claiming that the EPA is moving too fast-----even though the EPA is actually right on the schedule they presented to the community from the start-----ironically, the EPA is even ahead of the schedule that the city tried to sell to the community as being faster...

Angela Licata is also disputing the veracity of the EPA's findings regarding the toxic emissions via the CSO's into the canal.....sound familiar?? When the DEP was asked why they are resisting the suggestion of the retention basin,after all---it is the logical solution and one that has been requested for decades by Buddy Scotto and others and as they have done in other areas (non Superfund areas by the way)...what do they say? There are "cost benefits"....and who would pay?

Well we all would---just as we are paying for the retention system they installed in Paedagat Bay-----just as we all will pay for their $140,000,000 Green Infrastructure Plan which is still in the design phase only--that usually means even more expensive by the time it actually gets moving...(can you spell--'CITY TIME'???) and who knows how much for the Long Term Control Plan-

Are these necessary? Yes..both to satisfy the city's obligation to the state under the Clean Water Act and ultimately for the benefit of us all.
Are they worth it? Yes--- and dollar for dollar our water rates are still fairly inexpensive--think about your cable or cell phone bill---and then compare it to the value of your fresh drinking water and the fact that your toilets do flush and your drains work and the waste goes away...
Are these good reasons to do a less effective and so-so job for our community? ABSOLUTELY NOT!

Our community has been saddled with an antiquated sewer system. Our community, already densely populated, has been living with this open sewer running through its heart for far too long. Our community is slated to be even more densely populated---there is framework at City Planning that allows for thousands and thousands of additional units of housing in the Gowanus. There are the additional units that are scheduled for Atlantic Yards. Just take a look around and see how our neighborhood continues to grow.

Does it make sense to do anything less than the best job possible for the Canal? Does it make sense for the City of New York to skimp here when this once in a lifetime opportunity to address and correct this problem has arrived?

Mayor Bloomberg----we love the fresh drinking water the DEP supplies to us but it is time to literally stand up and cut the crap!

Please don't waste our time and money fighting the science....spend that money on behalf of the environment and the health of our community. What could be more important than that?

CORD

Please read: Tackling the Problem of Combined Sewer Overflow: Why Can't New York be More Like London? http://pardonmeforasking.blogspot.com/2012/04/tackling-problem-of-sewer-overflow-why.html


Thursday, April 5, 2012

BROOKLYN UTOPIAS SHOW OPENING TONIGHT!


The opening for the Brooklyn Utopias Show is tonight!
Brooklyn Utopias at The Old Stone House [336 Third St. between Fourth and Fifth Avenues, Park Slope (718) 768-3195]. April 5, 6:30 pm.

“Brooklyn Utopias: Park Space, Play Space” exhibition
dates: April 5-June 24, 2012

General Opening Reception: Thursday, April 5, 7:30-9:30pm

Special Patrons’ Preview and Curator Tour: 6:30-7:30pm (with donations of $10 and up: Visit our Kickstarter Page to join!)

Curator Katherine Gressel and select artists from the show will lead a lively discussion of the artwork in the show. Patrons will also receive a complementary glass of wine.

As posted earlier,

Interdisciplinary Artist, (and CORD Co-Founder) Triada Samaras, with Carroll Gardens CORD/Coalition for Respectful Development, will present a mural making/ artist activist workshop inspired by Public Place, Brooklyn in conjunction with the Brooklyn Utopias Park Space, Play Space Exhibition to be held at the Old Stone House, Brooklyn.

What: Public Voice. Public dream. Public Place: A Collaborative Mural Making Workshop to brainstorm creative solutions for Public Place

With: The Brooklyn Utopias Exhibition: Park Space, Play Space Exhibition

Where: Old Stone House: 336 Third Street, Park Slope, Brooklyn

Workshop Date: April 28, 2012

Workshop Time: 5 –7 PM

Who: Adults and/or Families with children 6+ years are welcome to participate.

Free and open to the public!

See the Brooklyn Paper article on the Brooklyn Utopias show, "Picture perfect: Artists explore 'Brooklyn Utopias' at Park Slope's Old Stone House" at http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/35/13/24_brooklynutopias_2012_03_30_bk.html

CORD

(First photo above, courtesy of the PMFA blog, second photo from the Gowanus Lounge Blog)

CORD HISTORY:

With the "Protect Our Homes" petition, CORD was formed in May, 2007. This petition arose as an overwhelmingly negative response to the coming of the over-sized 360 Smith Street Development at the corner of Smith Street and Second Place (Aka Oliver House; aka 131 Second Place). This petition, which had well over three thousand signatures, led to a new zoning text amendment in summer of 2008.

To: Our Elected Officials, Community Leaders, The MTA:
(MAY, 2007)

We the undersigned Carroll Gardens homeowners and residents, are appalled by the "as of right" ruling which allows owners and developers to erect buildings in our neighborhood with no regard to the impact they will present to our quality of life and the value of our homes........

http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?crlgrdns